USPTO serial 79225444
AU+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORAN, CAROLINE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AU+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Liquid soaps for bubble bath; bubble bath preparations; foam soaps; bubble baths; cakes of toilet soap; soap powder; natural soaps; gels and oils for tanning (cosmetics); gel facial mask being a kind of cosmetic masks; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; functional cosmetics; night cream; shaving creams for men; skin milk for men; skin fresheners for men; nail tips; nail enamel; nail enamel removers; gel nail removers; preparations for removing gel nails; cosmetic creams for firming skin around eyes; eye make-up; eye makeup (cosmetics); eyebrow tattoos; eye wrinkle removing creams; shampoo for the care of scalp; cosmetics for scalp; scalp stimulating preparations (not for medical use); dry shampoos; cosmetics for hair and scalp; cosmetics in the form of lotions; rouge; lip gloss; lipsticks; nail varnish; nail varnish removers; make-up removing creams; make-up; cosmetic preparations for the hair; hair colorants; moisturizers (cosmetics); moisturising lotions (cosmetic); moisturising body lotions cosmetic; moisturising skin lotions cosmetic; moisturizing creams, lotions and gels; body and beauty care cosmetics; body mists; body shampoo; cosmetic preparations for body care; moisturizing agents; dandruff shampoos; non-medicated toilet preparations; shampoos; shampoo-conditioners; sun block cosmetics; sun care preparations; nail polish and nail polish remover; nail care preparations; toiletry preparations; skin lotions; cosmetic preparations for skin care and skin treatment; after-sun creams and preparations; false nails; false eyelashes; eyelash tints; hair tints; cosmetics using natural substances; toothpaste and mouthwashes; teeth whitening preparations; tooth polishes; make-up for the face and body; hair lotions; hair wax; hair essence mists; hand lotions; cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |