Drawing for Serial No. 79225510

USPTO serial 79225510

Serial No. 79225510

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RONCORONI, LAUREN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79225510?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, degreasing and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Machines for abrading surfaces of material or parts thereof, in particular grinding disks and wheelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Small portable household and kitchen utensils and containers; combs and sponges; brushes (except paintbrushes); brush-making materials; cleaning instruments and material; steel wool; glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 6, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 12, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 9, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 29, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2018SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance