USPTO serial 79225862
MYO MUNCHEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYO MUNCHEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Intra-oral appliance; dental training device for teeth, tongues and facial muscles; medical device to alleviate or prevent snoring; dental device, namely, a soft flexible mouthguard like appliance that pulls mandible forward and optimises airways for breathing to assist with symptoms of sleep apnoea; chewable dental device for assisting with oral-facial development in children; chewable dental device that promotes optimal function of oral-facial area in adults; chewable dental device that promotes healthy development of teeth, lip and tongue strength in children; dental device that promotes nose breathing; dental device, namely, a flexible mouthguard like device that reduces teeth clenching and damage to teeth; dental device with brushlike protrusions that assists with the treatment of periodontal disease; dental device that can assist withimprove speech and oral motor function; dental device that can be used to assist in the treatment of tempero-mandibular joint dysfunction; dental device which has brush like protrusions that can be used to assist in oral hygiene | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Myo Munchee (Holdings) Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Mary Florence Bourke
- Other trademarks owned by Myo Munchee (Holdings) Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Afirm Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MYO MUNCHEE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |