USPTO serial 79226011
Serial No. 79226011
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5705806Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2019
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79226011?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software design; software development; research and development of new products for others; software development in the nature of software design; computer software installation; computer software maintenance; updating of software; software rental; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; services provided by consultants relating to computer hardware design and development, namely, consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; digitization of documents; software as a service (Saas) services featuring software for trust services, namely, software for use in creating electronic signatures, electronic seals, and electronic time stamps; cloud computing, namely, providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; information technology consultancy; hosting of servers; electronic data storage | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |