USPTO serial 79226137
HILDEBRAND TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5790148Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2019
- Examiner
- SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HILDEBRAND TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle Liudahl
Kyle Liudahl Gema Switzerland GmbH c/o Graco Inc.88 11th Avenue NEMinneapolis, MN 55413United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for operating electrostatic neutralising and ionising systems, static elimination systems and air ionisers and air deionisers for use in commercial and industrial applications for controlling electrostatic charge generated by machines; electrode carriers for electrostatic emission control devices, namely, electrostatic precipitators for the treatment of solids by reducing particulate emission in industrial applications, controllers and control devices for electrostatic emission control devices, namely, electrostatic precipitators for the treatment of solids by reducing particulate emission in industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Air purifying, air conditioning apparatus based on the principle of electrostatic neutralising and ionising technology; air ionisers and air deionisers for use in commercial and industrial applications for controlling electrostatic charge generated by machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | User manuals for electrostatic neutralising and ionising systems, static elimination systems, air ionisers and for air deionisers for use in commercial and industrial applications for controlling electrostatic charge generated by machines; user manuals for electrostatically neutralising electrode carriers and accessories therefor, including charging apparatus, power supply units, control devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEMA Switzerland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GEMA Switzerland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GEMA Switzerland GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HILDEBRAND TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |