USPTO serial 79226383
OMNIBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON II, COLLIER L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMNIBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
26127 Oldenburg, DE
26127 Oldenburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Davis
BRIAN M. DAVIS VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 FAIRVIEW RD; SUITE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28277UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business data and processes analysis and automation with machine learning and deep learning, research and information services with machine learning and deep learning; business data and processes assistance and robotic process automation with machine learning and deep learning, management and administrative services with support of machine learning and deep learning; commercial trading of artificial intelligence and providing consumer information and process automation services using machine learning and deep learning; advertising, marketing and promotional services automation using machine learning and deep learning | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services that automate business and customer engagement processes through the use of with machine learning and deep learning, speech recognition and conversational artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | machine learning and deep learning, conversational ai, speech recognition and voice analytics design services; information technology IT engineering services, namely, creating website and mobile based indexes of information for others using information technology related to artificial intelligence, natural language processing, cognitive data processing, artificial neural networks, machine learning and similar technologies in the nature of deep neural networks and machine learning; design and development of robotics, Internet of Things (IOT) and process automation applications and services using neural networks and machine learning technologies. Authentication and security applications in the field of robotics, Internet of Things (IOT) and process automation through the use of voice biometrics and other deep neural networks and machine learning technologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Nov 25, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |