Drawing for ROCK

USPTO serial 79226642

ROCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCARTHY, BRIDGET ANN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Malarz

111 BRITTANY COURTCLILFTON, NJ 07013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages, mineral water, fruit juices, vegetable juices, smoothies, fruit drinks, vegetable drinks, syrups for beverages; non-alcoholic malt beverages, non-alcoholic malt based beverages; energy drinksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 20, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 18, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 18, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 18, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 9, 2019ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 1, 2019OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2019OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Nov 28, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 27, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 24, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 23, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance