USPTO serial 79226888
TEKNOWLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAGLINI, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEKNOWLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Catalogs; printed publications | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management assistance; commercial or industrial company management assistance; commercial or industrial company management assistance; compilation of information into computer databases; business organization consultancy; advisory services for business management; business management consultancy; professional business consultancy; market studies; commercial information via websites; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; presentation of goods on all communication media, for retail sale | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Organization and conducting of conferences; organization and conducting of seminars | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Conducting of technical project studies; services provided by consultants relating to Internet security; services provided by consultants relating to data security; information technology (IT) consultancy; technological consultancy services; information technology consultancy services; telecommunication technology consultancy services; software consultancy; computer security consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |