USPTO serial 79226898
TZAR DELICATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TZAR DELICATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Toasted laver; caviar; fish roe, prepared; isinglass for food; fish, tinned; bouillon concentrates; shrimps, not live; prawns, not live; salmon, not live; shellfish, not live; mussels, not live; lobsters, not live; fish-based foodstuffs; crayfish, not live; crustaceans, not live; fish, preserved; fish, not live; salted fish; sardines, not live; fat-containing mixtures for bread slices; oysters, not live; fish fillets; seaweed extracts for food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Import-export agency services; computerized file management; invoicing; demonstration of goods; commercial information and advice for consumers consumer advice shop; marketing research; business management and organization consultancy; business organization consultancy; business management consultancy; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; shop window dressing; provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; sales promotion for others; distribution of samples; on-line advertising on a computer network; procurement services for others purchasing goods and services for other businesses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |