USPTO serial 79226968
D DEAL SHAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D DEAL SHAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising the goods and services of online vendors via a searchable online guide; rental of advertising space; rental of advertising space on the internet; pay per click advertising; compiling indexes of information for commercial or advertising purposes; organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; updating of advertising material; providing business information via a web site; provision of commercial and business contact information; arranging commercial transactions, for others, via online shops; administrative processing of purchase orders; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; business intermediary services relating to the matching of potential private investors with entrepreneurs needing funding; market studies; web indexing for commercial or advertising purposes; marketing; sales promotion for others; search engine optimization for sales promotion; provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; data search in computer files for others; price comparison services; advertising; on-line advertising on a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |