Drawing for RSC BASIS

USPTO serial 79226974

RSC BASIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5784083Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 25, 2019
Examiner
PODESTA, GIDETTE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RSC BASIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diana Portna

Diana Portna Brandspace.legal2435 Bedford Street 12BStamford, CT 06905United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer apparatus, namely, computer peripheral apparatus, computers, supercomputers, computer hardware; monitors being downloadable computer programs for monitoring performance of high performance computing hardware and supercomputers; computer game software; computer programs in the nature of downloadable software for use in the field of high performance computing and supercomputers, namely, software for analyzing manufacturing processes; interfaces for computers; computer software applications, downloadable, namely, computer software for high performance computing and supercomputers in the nature of software for analyzing scientific data; computers; computer software, recorded, namely, computer operating software for high performance computing and supercomputers; computer programmes, recorded, namely, computer software for high performance computing and supercomputer applications being software for creating special effects in the media and entertainment industry; computer operating programs, recorded; all of the above are limited to the field of high performance computing and supercomputersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 24, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2025PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jan 13, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 9, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 22, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 10, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 10, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 9, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance