USPTO serial 79227013
CYBERVIGILANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5663459Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2019
- Examiner
- INGRAM, KYLE G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERVIGILANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin P. Ferguson
Kevin P. Ferguson Motorola Solutions, Inc.500 West Monroe Street, 43rd FloorChicago, IL 60661UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | surveillance cameras; surveillance videos being blank video tapes; wireless security cameras and video systems being installations for surveillance; computer application software for use with surveillance cameras and videos, namely, software for accessing, monitoring, sharing, and viewing recorded surveillance footage; software for recording, viewing, storing, sharing and analysing online audio and video; computer software for use as an application programming interface (API); sensors, namely, alarm sensors; electronic sensors for motion, humidity, temperature, and light; computer hardware for IP video surveillance; infrared cameras; video cameras; video surveillance monitoring and security systems, namely, closed circuit tv systems for security and surveillance consisting of cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, and recorders and combination video camera and two-way radio worn on the body for use by security personnel, security control panels and motion detectors, entry door systems comprising touch pads and security doors, electric and electronic video surveillance installations; video cameras with wireless transmission capacity; remote monitoring and analysis equipment and software, namely, cameras and software for viewing surveillance footage collected from security cameras; computer software used to operate, manage and monitor security systems, cameras, fire alarms, alarm central units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, personal security alarms, smoke and gas alarms, home surveillance systems, lighting controls and home automation devices; alarm systems, namely, alarm installations and alarms, fire alarms, burglar alarms; cameras; surveillance apparatus, namely, cameras and motion detectors; electronic intrusion detectors being anti-intrusion alarms; software for electronic sensor monitoring of physical activity, remote automation, and security; computer hardware and computer software, all for use in residences and businesses for management, automation and monitoring of electronic sensors of physical activity and physical premises security systems; wireless transmitters and receivers for wireless local area networking; audio and video recording apparatus, namely, audio recorders and video recorders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | platform as a service (PAAS) featuring software platforms for remotely viewing monitoring, programming, operating, and controlling surveillance camera systems; processing of video data, namely, interpreting video content and identifying segments that contain predefined key events; providing online non-downloadable software for recording, viewing, storing, sharing, and analysing online audio, video, and environmental data; hosting a network service that enables users to transfer control and image data using network communication protocols for use with physical premises surveillance systems; application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting of software applications that allow users to remotely view, monitor, program, operate and control camera systems, cameras, fire alarms, alarm central units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, personal security alarms, smoke and gas alarms, home surveillance systems, lighting controls and home automation devices; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for processing of video data, namely, interpreting video content and identifying segments that contain predefined key events; information technology support services, namely, information technology consulting in the field of physical premises surveillance systems; design and development of camera systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDIGOVISION LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INDIGOVISION LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INDIGOVISION LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYBERVIGILANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 3, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 1, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |