Drawing for CORESIC

USPTO serial 79227085

CORESIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5563254Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 18, 2018
Examiner
GULIANO, ROBERT N
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CORESIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Omar F. Darwich

Omar F. Darwich The Darwich Law Firm, LLC300 Weatherstone Dr #190Wadsworth, OH 44281United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Agricultural machines, namely, cultivators, harvesters, disk harrows, seeders; papermaking machines; ] valves being parts of machines; machine parts, namely, grindstones; machine parts, namely, bearings [ ; machine parts, namely, molds for use in the manufacture of metal and plastic pipes; pumps as parts of machines, motors and engines ]ACTIVE—
009Lenses for astrophotography; [ semi-conductors; integrated circuits; bullet resistant vests; bullet resistant clothing; solar batteries; ] batteriesACTIVE—
011[ Cooling installations for water; gas condensers, other than parts of machines; ] heating elements; [ heat exchangers not being parts of machines; ] kiln furniture as supports used in kilns; [ solar collectors; water purification installations; air conditioning apparatus; ] lighting apparatus for vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 3, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 3, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 30, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 1, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 1, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 18, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance