USPTO serial 79227112
RAVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5699808Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 2019
- Examiner
- RADCLIFF, BRENT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Nolte Lackenbach SiegelScarsdale, NY 10583Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the manufacture of optical monomers used for optical lenses, sun lenses, and safety glasses, for lenses and filters for cameras and optical equipment and instruments, for aircraft windows and ship portholes, for windows and glass windows of civil and industrial buildings, and for transparent surfaces | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |