USPTO serial 79227374
LALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5688186Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2019
- Examiner
- FOSS, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric T. Fingerhut
Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100 WestWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Musical instruments; electronic musical instruments; sheet music stands; cases for musical instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |