USPTO serial 79227680
C-ION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C-ION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Bridge Intellectual Property Services PL23716 Woodward Ave.Pleasant Ridge, MI 48069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Capacitors; batteries; storage cells, namely, electrical cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Energy production; generation of energy; production of energy; consultancy services relating to the generation of electrical power; electricity generating; electricity generation; generating of electricity; generation of electricity; generation of electrical power using carbon sequestration; generation of power | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Advisory services relating to scientific research; advisory services relating to testing the functionality of scientific instruments; chemical engineering; chemical technological research; compilation of scientific information; consultancy in the field of scientific research; design and development of regenerative energy generation systems; advisory services relating to energy efficiency; research in the field of energy produced by batteries and electrical cells; advisory services relating to the use of energy in batteries and electrical cells; consultancy relating to technological services in the field of power and energy supply; development of energy and power management systems; consultancy in the field of designing and developing energy-saving products; preparation of reports relating to technical research in the field of batteries and electrical cells; preparation of reports relating to scientific research; providing science technology information; provision of information relating to scientific research; providing engineering technical advice relating to energy-saving measures; scientific research and development services; scientific research and development for others; scientific research; research to develop new products; scientific research services; scientific advisory services related to batteries and electrical cells; scientific and industrial research in the field of batteries and electrical cells; scientific research and analysis in the field of batteries and electrical cells; scientific and technological design in the field of batteries and electrical cells; scientific consultancy in the field of batteries and electrical cells; scientific services, namely, research related to batteries and electrical cells and design relating thereto in the field of batteries and electrical cells; technical research in the field of batteries and electrical cells; consumer product design in the field of batteries and electrical cells; custom design services in the field batteries and electrical cells; design and development of new technology for others in the field of batteries and electrical cells; industrial design in the field of batteries and electrical cells; design of industrial products in the field of batteries and electrical cells; design of products in the field of batteries and electrical cells; product research and development of products; new product design in the field of batteries and electrical cells; design of new products in the field of batteries and electrical cells; product design and development in the field of batteries and electrical cells | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |