Drawing for QRYPTOS Q

USPTO serial 79227797

QRYPTOS Q

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QRYPTOS Q?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Masaru SATO

3-6-11 Ariake, Koto-TFT Bldg. East 9FTokyo, 135-8071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Transfer of funds via electronic communication networks; electronic virtual currency transfer services; electronic virtual currency trading; foreign exchange transactionsABANDONED—
042Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for electronic trading and transmitting digital assets and currencies; temporary use of non-downloadable online software for electronic trading and transmitting digital assets and currenciesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2018MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2018ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2018ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Nov 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 20, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 17, 2018ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2018CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 27, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 21, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 9, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance