Drawing for KAIKO

USPTO serial 79227841

KAIKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAIKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

CHRISTINE B REDFIELD REDFIELD IP PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION50 WOODSIDE PLAZA NO 107REDWOOD CITY, CA 94061UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, sweaters, jerseys, coats, jumpers, vests, jackets, raincoats, parkas, skirts, dresses, pants, shorts, sweatpants, warm-up suits, trousers, overalls, sleepwear, bathrobes, underwear, belts made of leather; headwear, namely, hats, wool hats, caps, headbands; scarves, shawls, cloth bibs; footwear, namely, sneakers, shoes, boots, beach shoes, sandals, slippers, socks, hosiery; glovesACTIVE—
035Advertising and marketing in the field of clothing and clothing accessories; retail store services in the field of clothing and clothing accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 30, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 23, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 30, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 27, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 27, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
May 21, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 6, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 1, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 1, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 1, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 27, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 4, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 3, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance