Drawing for BLUE STAR

USPTO serial 79228101

BLUE STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine; sparkling wines; wine-based beverage, namely, prepared wine cocktails, spritzers, aperitifs with a wine base, wine coolers, wine punches, wine-based drinks, piquetteSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 11, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 26, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 26, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance