Drawing for HEATMAX

USPTO serial 79228379

HEATMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5658540Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2019
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEATMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry L. Rollo

Sherry L. Rollo Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP200 West MadisonSuite 2700Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
023Filament yarn; bulky yarn; artificial silk thread; yarn; thread, namely spun yarn, thread for textile useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
024Fabric for use in manufacture of clothing, footwear and accessories; jersey material of synthetic fabricSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 8, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 22, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 22, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 16, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance