USPTO serial 79228653
SAHARA PREMIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEDMAN, CORI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAHARA PREMIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints; mordants for use in the building like traditional paints and decorative paints; varnishes; aluminium paints; anti - corrosive preparations, namely, paints, acrylic resin, coatings, coatings made of cement, etc.; bactericidal paints; badigeon; wood coatings as paints; wood mordants for use in the building; wood stains; sienna earth as pigment; coatings for roofing felt as paint; lime wash; colorants; wood preservatives; thinners for paints; thinners for lacquers; organic ed inorganic dyes; pigments; distempers; enamels as acrylic and alkyd enamels for use on iron, wood and walls; enamels for painting; clear and pigmented coatings in the nature of paint; fixatives in spray form for industrial use in the nature of an acrylic protective coating; glazes; protective preparations for metals, namely, rust protecting paints; anti - rust preparation for preservation in the nature ogcoatings; whitewash; dyewood; mordants for use in coloring wood; lacquers; anti - fouling paints; turpentine for use as paint thinner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |