USPTO serial 79228915
VIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy Wang
Timothy Wang NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC8140 Walnut Hill LaneSuite 500Dallas, TX 75231Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; provision of space on websites for advertising goods and services; providing business information via a website; sales promotion for others; compiling indexes of information for commercial or advertising purposes; systemization of information into computer databases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2019 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |