USPTO serial 79229196
SCOTT FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCOTT FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed vegetables and fruit; organic fruit and vegetable foodstuffs, namely, products incorporating sweet potatoes; vegetable crisps; sweet potato crisps; potato crisps; cooked and fried vegetables; vegetable chips; sweet potato chips; potato chips; vegetable-based snack foods; edible oils and fats; cooking oils; soups; jellies, jams, marmalade; meat, fish, fruit and vegetable preserves | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sauces in the nature of condiments; vinegar, spices, marinades, chutneys, relishes and salad dressing, cooking sauces; freshly prepared meals consisting primarily of sweet potato; prepared and pre-prepared meals consisting primarily of sweet potato; pasta sauces; vegetable pies; flans and quiches; chips; food flavourings, other than essential oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruit and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, both off-line and on-line featuring food and drink; advertising and promotion services and information services relating thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| May 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |