USPTO serial 79229264
WOCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUFFIN, GRACE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WOCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford D. Hyra
Clifford D. Hyra Symbus Law Group, LLC11710 Plaza America Drive, Suite 2000Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless communication apparatus, namely, routers, wireless transmitters and receivers, wireless transceiver radio and industrial wireless point-to-mulitpoint radios, antennas and equipment for receiving and distributing signals transmitted by satellites or terrestrial transmitters; two-way wireless communication systems, namely, routers, wireless transmitters and receivers, wireless transceiver radio and industrial wireless point-to-mulitpoint radios; wireless routers for routing audio, video and digital signals; network controlling apparatus, namely, network cards, multiswitsches, power splitters; wireless routers; computer programs for network management; network cabling, namely, telecommunications cables, coaxial cables; telecommunications equipment, namely, signal generators; coaxial cables; network management control apparatus, namely, computer interface device; network routers; coaxial relays; coaxial connectors; coaxial switches; coaxial attenuators; coaxial adaptors; coaxial resonators; gender changers for coaxial cables; USB dongles being wireless network adapters; telecommunications apparatus for use with mobile networks, namely, mobile hotspot devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering design services; design of telecommunications apparatus and equipment; design and development of software and hardware for signal amplification and transmission; design and development of wireless communication apparatus; development of software and hardware for network operations; Technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |