Drawing for THERMOLOOP

USPTO serial 79229289

THERMOLOOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5645971Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2019
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMOLOOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Eilberg

WILLIAM H. EILBERG WILLIAM H. EILBERG316 CALIFORNIA AVE.NO. 785RENO, NV 89509

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Abrasive wires of metal; abrasive wires with metal core and having at least one abrasive particle layerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Cutting machines; cutting machines for working with abrasive wires; cutting machines for processing semiconductor wafers; abrasive wires being parts of machines; abrasive wires for semiconductor wafer cutting being parts of machines; abrasive wires for ceramic material cutting being parts of machines; abrasive wires for sapphire cutting being parts of machines; abrasive wires for silicon carbide cutting being parts of machines; abrasive wires for quartz cutting being parts of machines; abrasive wires for silicon nitride cutting being parts of machines; abrasive wires for aluminum nitride cutting being parts of machines; semiconductor cutting machines; equipment for processing semi-conductor wafersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Cutting of materials by abrasion; cutting of metals by abrasion; cutting of materials by means of abrasive wiresSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 25, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 8, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 17, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 8, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 5, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 4, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance