USPTO serial 79229586
NEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5853743Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 2019
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole Kinsley, Esq.
NICOLE KINSLEY FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BOULEVARDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pesticides for rodent control; rodenticides; freeze-dried food bait to attract rodents for pest control purposes; rodent repellents; all of the aforementioned for industrial and domestic use; all the aforementioned not including parasiticides, fungicides, bactericides, insecticides and herbicides | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Rodent pest control units, namely, traps for rodents both metallic and non-metallic; rodent traps; bait stations for trapping rodents, sold empty; bait boxes and trap boxes for trapping rodents sold empty; electrical rodent killing traps; electrical rodent deterrent apparatus being ultrasonic pest repellents; electrical and electronic apparatus for destroying insects, pests, rodents and vermin; electrical rodent control units in the nature of traps; electronic rodent control units in the nature of traps; electric rodent traps; all of the aforementioned for industrial and domestic use; bait dispensers in the nature of plastic containers for storing bait used for pest control for household use; replacement parts for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |