USPTO serial 79229649
JOLLY PURE GOODNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOLLY PURE GOODNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D Wells
NICHOLAS D WELLS LEGENDS LAW GROUP PLLC330 N MAIN STREETKAYSVILLE, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned goods, namely, lychees in syrup, rambutan in syrup; rambutan with pineapple in syrup, asparagus spears, cut and peeled water chestnuts, corn oil for food, soya bean oil for food, canola oil for food; cooked fruits, and vegetables, jellies and edible oils, mushroom pieces and stem; whole mushroom, premium sliced mushrooms; shitake mushrooms; processed cream corn; processed whole kernel sweet corn; cut asparagus; garbanzos; straw mushroom; tomato paste; grass jelly; mandarin orange segments; cream of mushroom soup; canned goods and preserved goods, namely, green peas and black beans, pineapple tidbits, pineapple chunks, young whole sweet corn, young cut sweet corn | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |