Drawing for JIEPAK

USPTO serial 79229741

JIEPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEN, ELIZABETH S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JIEPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Tablet computers; portable media players; cabinets for loudspeakers; audio- and video-receivers; television apparatus for projection purposes; materials for electricity mains, namely, wires and cables; voltage stabilizing power supply; DVD players; video screens; horns for loudspeakersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 25, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 12, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance