Drawing for CFR CEFRUN

USPTO serial 79229764

CFR CEFRUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5730394Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 23, 2019
Examiner
TURNER, LAUREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CFR CEFRUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric food blenders for household purposes; sewage pulverizers being machines; dish washing machines; food waste disposers, namely, garbage disposals; coffee grinders, other than hand-operatedSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Containers for household or kitchen use; jugs; cooking pot sets; hand-operated brush used to clean skin; tea services in the nature of tableware; scoops for serving or portioning being household or kitchen utensils; non-electric food blenders for household purposes; fruit presses, non-electric, for household purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 7, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 23, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 23, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Nov 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 13, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 11, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 10, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance