CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NLR

USPTO serial 79229788

NLR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5671968Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2019
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NLR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 Madison Street, Suite AOak Park, IL 60302United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Transport by air; passenger transport; advisory services in the field of transport by airACTIVE—
042Development of software; design and consultancy in the field of engineering; consultancy in the field of testing of materials and product quality and safety testing; analysis and evaluation of product design; quality control for others; advisory services related to technological development, namely, product development consulting; consultancy by experts in the field of technology, in particular relating to aviation and space travel, namely, scientific research consulting in the field of aviation and space travel, engineering consulting in the field of aviation and space travel; engineering consultancy relating to noise reduction; consultancy relating to engineering services in the field of efficiency of energy; analysis of technical data, namely, data mining, IT consulting; technical research in the field of aviation; design and development of aircraftACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 16, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 15, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 26, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 12, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 10, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance