USPTO serial 79230074
REM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELMAN, JESSE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch
Keith A. Weltsch Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300Garden City, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Friction stir welding machines, friction stir processing machines, milling machines; drilling machines; chamfer machines for metalworking; machines for modifying the mechanical properties of metallic materials, namely, broaching, bending, cutting, grinding machines; machine tools for milling, drilling, swarf removal, for metalworking; machine tools for modifying the mechanical properties of metallic materials, namely, broaching, bending, cutting, grinding machines; boring machines; milling and drilling machines; turning machines; machining centers; parts of machines, namely, reamers and machine heads for grinding, drilling, boring; parts of machines being calibration devices of the machine geometry and measurement devices of the machine geometry and machine reset devices, namely, regulators, being machine components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |