USPTO serial 79230095
KINTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KINTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic devices for security and automation systems, for area monitoring, for access control, for fire extinguishing, fire detection and fire safety; software for the programming and the function of electric and electronic devices for security and automation systems, for area monitoring, for access control, for fire extinguishing, fire detection and fire safety | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction, repair and installation services of electric and electronic systems for security and automation, for area monitoring, for access control, for fire extinguishing, fire detection and fire safety | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and relevant research and design in the field of security and automation, area monitoring, access control, fire extinguishing, fire detection and fire safety systems; industrial analysis and research services in the field of security and automation, area monitoring, access control, fire extinguishing, fire detection and fire safety systems; design and development of computer hardware and software in the field of security and automation, area monitoring, access control, fire extinguishing, fire detection and fire safety systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services for the protection of property and individuals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TBSP ENGINEERING ANONIMOS TECHNIKI ETERIA EMPORIAS, KATASKEVIS IPOSTIRIXIS SISTIMATON KE ERGON
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named KINTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |