Drawing for DOM RUINART

USPTO serial 79230197

DOM RUINART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5777983Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 18, 2019
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DOM RUINART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy DiConza

Nancy DiConza Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines produced in the Champagne region of France in accordance with adopted standards; sparkling winesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 28, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 25, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 18, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 20, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 20, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2018RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Apr 19, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance