USPTO serial 79230655
IGNITION VR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IGNITION VR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications; communication services; broadcasting, including pay television broadcasting and subscription television broadcasting; streaming services; video, audio and television streaming services; video-on-demand transmission; webcasting services; netcasting (broadcasting over a global computer network); podcasting services; vlogging (video blogging) services, namely, audio, video and multimedia broadcasting via the internet and other communications networks; news agency services; radio broadcasting; operation of television cable networks; electronic transmission (uploading, posting or displaying) of data, information, pictures, images, audio and/or video via online forums; communication, broadcasting, and streaming services, and data, digital, audiovisual, video and voice transmission services, of information, data, audio-visual recordings, podcasts, vlogs (video blogs), multi-media recordings, user-generated content, communications, messages, text, posts, surveys, reports, reviews, opinions, documents, electronic publications, or a combination thereof; internet platforms and portals, mobile internet portals, and web portal services (providing user access to a global computer network); providing access to content, websites and portals; providing access to web, mail and news portals; providing access to databases, electronic databases and online computer databases; transmission of database information via telecommunication networks and global computer networks; transmission of, and provision of access to, information, messages, data and multimedia content via the internet and other communication networks; providing user access to online forums for the transmission of messages among computer users; providing information, advice and consultancy in relation to the aforesaid services; provision of all the aforesaid services including by electronic means, on-line, via a website, the internet or other computer networks, by wireless technology, accessible by mobile phone and other internet-enabled devices, and/or via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |