USPTO serial 79230665
B-NEXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B-NEXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment; computers; computer; software, in particular software for monitoring, data management, risk management, data analysis, identification of compliance relevant risks or trading activities, for recording or accessing business and trading activities, system backup, forgery - proof audit trails, and for archiving or historicizing data and data results | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Management of data in computer databases; advertising; compilation of data for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Organizing seminars, trainings and workshops | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological consultancy and technical consultancy relating to the application and use of computer software, creating, installing, servicing and updating of computer programs, in particular creating, installing, maintaining and updating software for monitoring, for data management, for risk management, for data analysis, for identifying compliant risks or trading activities, for record or access business and trading activities, system backup, forgery-proof audit trails, and archiving or historicizing data and results | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |