Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79230902?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79230902. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79230902, the listed owner(s) include: ADIAMAS, ADIAMAS, ADIAMAS.

What is USPTO serial number 79230902?

Serial number 79230902 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND?

DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND (79230902) currently shows USPTO status code 709 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND?

The public record lists International Classes: 007, 008. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND Serial# 79230902 | status 709; last event NREP | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David D. Rodrigues

David D. Rodrigues Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C.270 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Cutting and slicing tools for machines for household or industrial use for culinary and food preparation in the nature of machines; sharpening machines; machines for sharpening; knives being parts of machines; blades being parts of machines, saw blades being parts of machines; meat choppers being parts of machines; all of the aforementioned goods for use in the culinary and food preparation fields	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
008	Hand-operated hand tools and implements in the nature of hand-operated meat choppers, hand operated mincing knives, hand operated cheese slicers, hand operated vegetable choppers, hand operated vegetable knives, hand operated vegetable slicers; non-electric table cutlery; table forks; table spoons, side arms, other than firearms, namely, hunting knives; razors; sharpening steels; sharpening instruments, namely, sharpening rods and sharpening steels; sharpening stones; vegetable knives; blades for knives, saws, razors; mincing knives	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 27, 2026	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Mar 27, 2026	C71T	CANCELLED SECTION 71	—
Sep 10, 2024	REM3	COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED	—
Jan 24, 2020	FINO	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jan 8, 2020	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Jan 8, 2020	FIMP	FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	—
Dec 10, 2019	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Sep 10, 2019	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 25, 2019	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Jun 25, 2019	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2019	GPNX	NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jun 5, 2019	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Jun 5, 2019	NONP	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	—
Jun 5, 2019	OP2R	NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
May 20, 2019	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 7, 2019	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
May 6, 2019	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 6, 2019	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 6, 2019	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2018	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2018	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2018	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2018	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 15, 2018	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 15, 2018	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2018	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
May 11, 2018	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
May 11, 2018	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
May 8, 2018	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
May 7, 2018	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2018	MAFR	APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED	—
Apr 30, 2018	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 30, 2018	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Apr 26, 2018	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—

DIAMONDS ARE A CHEF'S BEST FRIEND