USPTO serial 79230946
SPHERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPHERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education and entertainment services in the field of cinematographic broadcasting; educational services, namely, conducting training courses in the field of motion picture theatre sound system installation, operation and maintenance; consultation relating to sound and visual recording productions; entertainment services, namely, motion picture theaters, cinema theaters, the presentation of theatrical, musical and cinematic shows, events and performances; conducting of ceremonies and events for entertainment purposes; arranging, organizing, and conducting competitions; providing recreation facilities for award ceremonies by others; providing information via website in the field of sound reproduction and recording and sound reproduction and recording services in the cinema | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto in the field of cinematographic broadcasting; industrial analysis and research services in the field of cinematographic broadcasting; design, development and maintenance of computer software in the field of cinematographic broadcasting; inspection and quality control, all relating to the making of sound and visual recordings, to the transfer of sound and visual recordings onto film, to the duplication of audio or video recordings, to optimal playback of sound and video on films, and to the surveying of theaters and of cinemas for the installation of sound and visual reproducing equipment in theaters and cinemas; technological consultation relating to the surveying of theaters, design of theaters, design and arrangement of seating, acoustics, and design of cinemas for the installation of sound and visual reproducing equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |