USPTO serial 79231065
TIGA FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5583085Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2018
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIGA FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D Wells
Nicholas D Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, frozen fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preparations for making bouillon; broth; fish-based foodstuffs; ham; meat, preserved; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; butter; buttercream; cheese; cream being dairy products; curd; falafel; milk beverages, namely, kefir; yoghurt; edible oils and fats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |