USPTO serial 79231356
WILDFIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANDARA, KEYLA MARIA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILDFIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH SWEDO
KEITH SWEDO MERIDIAN IP LLC12990 BRIGHTON LANECARMEL, IN 46032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, except beers; mead; brandy; rice alcohol; alcoholic bitters; anise being a liqueur; anisette being a liqueur; energy drink with alcohol; rum-based beverages; alcoholic coffee-based beverages; alcoholic tea-based beverages; edible alcoholic beverages, namely, alcoholic beverages containing fruit; alcoholic beverages, excluding beers; alcoholic fruit beverages; carbonated alcoholic beverages, except beer; low-alcohol beverages, except beer; low-grade alcoholic beverages, except beer; liquors; alcoholic energy drinks; Japanese beverages with a high alcohol content in the nature of liquors flavored with Asian plum extracts; bourbon; cachaça; prepared alcoholic cocktails; milk-based alcoholic cocktails; alcoholic cocktails in the form of frozen gelatins; cream liqueurs; cherry distillates in the nature of cherry brandy; alcoholic essences; alcoholic cocktails in the form of jellies; gin; sherry; calvados liqueur; peppermint liqueurs; fermented liqueur; liqueurs; herbal liqueurs; alcoholic cocktail mixes; alcoholic eggnog; rum punch; alcoholic punches; preparations for making alcoholic beverages, namely, alcoholic cocktail mixes; rum; sugar cane juice rum; sake; sangria; dry cider; vermouth; whisky; vodka | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 17, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |