USPTO serial 79231635
NUCLEUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUCLEUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Vogel
Jason M. Vogel Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP3 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services; advertising services; medical referrals; all of the aforesaid services being provided online, electronically or by other means | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, research in the field of hearing loss and development of new hearing aid products; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer consultancy and computer technology consultancy services, namely, software as a services (SAAS) feature software for securing patient medical data, patient personal and financial information, hearing aid data and prosthetic hearing device data; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for medical data capture, storage, processing, and transmission; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for practice management, managing clinics and managing clinical data; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for fitting, programming, controlling, testing, monitoring and managing hearing aids, prosthetic hearing devices and associated speech processors; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for use in the diagnosis, managing of treatment plans, and monitoring the amelioration of hearing deficiencies; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for managing patient financing, patient credit card processing, patient communications, patient claims processing, patient call sourcing, patient calendaring and patient document processing; electronic data storage; computerised electronic data storage services; none of the aforesaid including services for electrical energy utilisation or smart grids | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services; audiologist services, namely hearing aid services and prosthetic hearing device services; speech and hearing therapy; medical services for the treatment and aid of the hearing impaired; auditory habilitation and rehabilitation services; medical counselling; optometry services; speech and language therapy services; surgical treatment services; medical diagnostic services for identifying hearing deficiencies; providing medical and medical device information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |