USPTO serial 79232209
SILKHOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILKHOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Aprons [clothing]; ascots; bandanas; beach clothes; belts [clothing]; berets; clothing; clothing of imitations of leather; clothing of leather; coats; combinations [clothing]; dresses; fur stoles; gabardines [clothing]; gloves [clothing]; hats; headbands [clothing]; hoods [clothing]; jackets [clothing]; knitwear [clothing]; leggings [trousers]; mantillas; masquerade costumes; mitres [hats]; miters [hats]; mittens; muffs [clothing]; neck scarves [mufflers]; neck scarfs [mufflers]; mufflers [neck scarves]; neckties; outerclothing; overalls; smocks; overcoats; topcoats, parkas; pelerines; ponchos; ready-made clothing; scarves; scarfs; shawls; skull caps; sweaters; pullovers; jumpers [pullovers]; tee-shirts; tights; turbans; uniforms; wimples | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 29, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |