Drawing for DECKARD HAND MADE

USPTO serial 79232256

DECKARD HAND MADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DECKARD HAND MADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, including underwear and outerclothing, other than special purpose protective clothing; socks, mufflers (clothing), shawls, bandanas, scarves, belts (clothing); footwear, shoes, slippers, sandals; headgear, hats, caps with visors, berets, caps (headwear), skull capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2019PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 12, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 11, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 9, 2019PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 9, 2019TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 31, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance