Drawing for HINOMOTO

USPTO serial 79232316

HINOMOTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5772009Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 11, 2019
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HINOMOTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly M. Ford Lewis

Holly M. Ford Lewis Oliff PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[ Shutters of metal; hinges of metal; metal casters; casters of metal for suitcases and bags; locks of metal for bags; locks of metal; keys of metal for locks ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
018[ Handbag frames ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020plastic fasteners used in the manufacture and repair of suitcases and bags; Non-metal fasteners, namely, nails, wedges, nuts, screws, tacks, bolts, rivets and casters, all used in the manufacture and repair of suitcases and bags; locks of plastics; locks, non-electric, not of metal; industrial packaging containers of plastics; tool boxes, not of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 26, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 202571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 25, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 11, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 26, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2019PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Dec 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 27, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 26, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance