USPTO serial 79232397
SWEAT TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWEAT TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; perfumery; colognes; eau de cologne; eau de toilette; solid perfumes; deodorants for personal use; body cleaning and beauty care preparations, namely, body washes, beauty creams; non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmetics for the treatment of dry skin; cosmetics for use in the treatment of wrinkled skin; wrinkle removing skin care preparations; moisturiser; bath and shower gels; bath oils; non-medicated soaps; non-medicated hand wash; hand and foot scrubs; body scrub; body oils; body lotions; hand lotions; lotions for the face; toning lotion, for the face, body and hands; skin toners; body milks; body creams; facial washes and cleansers; facial wipes namely, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes, wipes impregnated with skin cleansers; face creams; face scrubs (non-medicated); beauty balm creams; beauty masks; eye gels; eye lotions; eye cream; nail cream; nail care preparations; hair care preparations; shampoos; hair conditioner; hair lotions; hair oils; perfumed powder; perfumed talcum powder; toiletries; aftershaves; aftershave balms and lotions; shaving gels; shaving soap; shaving foam; shaving balm; shaving preparations; scented oils; essential oils; cosmetic oils; massage oils; fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; room fragrances; room fragrancing preparations; scented room sprays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |