USPTO serial 79232517
KANGURU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KANGURU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Energy drinks (dietary supplements); pharmaceutical preparations for human use; stimulants for pharmaceutical purposes; medicinal herbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Aerated beverages (non-alcoholic); alcohol-free beverages; beverages consisting of a blend of fruit and vegetable juices; beverages made from fruit concentrates; fruit beverages; fruit juice beverages; mineral water (beverages); non-alcoholic beverages (except non-alcoholic beer); powders for effervescing beverages; sherbets (beverages); syrups for beverages; vegetable juice concentrates (beverages); vegetable juices (beverages); waters (beverages); non-alcoholic cocktails; beer; energy drinks (not for medical purposes); aerated water; water for drinking (other than for medical purposes); soft drinks; sports drinks (non-medicated); fruit drinks; aerated fruit juices; fresh fruit juices; fresh vegetable juices; frozen vegetable juices; preparations for making aerated water; concentrates for use in the preparation of soft drinks; fruit juices; low calorie fruit juices; non-fermented fruit juices; aerated juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |