USPTO serial 79232525
BABY BLISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODWIN, KATRINA JOYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABY BLISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
42657 Solingen, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Breast-nursing pads; disposable babies' diaper-pants; disposable nappy liners; disposable training pants (diapers); nappy covers; paper diapers; paper liners for diapers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2019 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |