USPTO serial 79232703
C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Insulating oil for transformers; insulating oils; insulating paper; insulating fabrics; insulating varnish; metal foil for insulation; mineral wool for insulation; glass wool for insulation; insulators for cables; insulators for electric mains; insulating bands; insulating tapes; electrical insulation materials made from porcelain; waterproof packings for industrial and commercial packing use; padding materials of rubber or plastics; insulating paints; stuffing of rubber or plastics; expansion joint fillers; packing, namely, cushioning, stuffing materials of rubber or plastics; synthetic rubber; rubber solutions; rings of rubber; stuffing rings of rubber; water-tight rings for plumbing pipes; draught excluder strips, namely, insulating materials in the form of strips to eliminate wind drafts; rubber stoppers for industrial packaging containers; pipe gaskets, namely, pipe gaskets; rubber bags in the nature of envelopes or pouches for merchandise packaging; joint packings for water pipes; seals, namely, cylinder joinings; lute, namely, sealing material; pipe muffs, not of metal; pipe jackets, not of metal; rubber sleeves for protecting parts of machines; sealant compounds for joints; adhesive tapes for conduit joints, namely, pipe joint tape; acrylic resins, semi-processed; ebonite; synthetic resins, semi-processed; artificial resins, semi-processed; plastic substances, semi-processed; organic glass, namely, polymethyl methacrylate in the form glass wool for building insulation; flexible hoses, not of metal; non-conducting materials for retaining heat, namely, insulating materials; insulating materials; dielectrics in the nature of insulating materials, insulators in the nature of insulating materials | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |