USPTO serial 79232863
RADIKAL DARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RADIKAL DARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nigamnarayan Acharya
Nigamnarayan Acharya LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP633 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 4000Los Angeles, CA 4044762002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring and signaling apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic scoreboards; counters in the nature of electronic scoreboards; controllers and computer controllers for electronic games and gaming equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Watches; sports watches; digital watches; electronic watches excluding smart watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Headgear, namely, hats and caps; clothing, namely, tops; footwear; tee-shirts; hoodies; shorts; caps; hats | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and toys, namely, electronic dart games; tossing games and dart games; apparatus for playing darts; darts and parts thereof; dart boards and game boards; electronic games and gaming equipment, namely, dart games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Game analysis and training analysis, in each case for training and entertainment purposes, game consulting and training consulting, in each case also via the Internet and in connection with dart games; electronic and computer-aided game analysis and training analysis, in each case for training and entertainment purposes, game consulting and training consulting, in each case also via the Internet and in connection with dart games; arranging and conducting electronic games, competitions, events, sporting events, competitions and betting games in networks and the Internet, in each case also in connection with dart games; arranging and conducting competitions, betting games, events, sporting matches and events in connection with dart games and except for promotional events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |