USPTO serial 79232868
PROTUF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PASSMAN, NICOLE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTUF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Handelsman
Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unprocessed plastics in the form of powder or granules for manufacturing automotive parts; unprocessed synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of plastic moulding compounds for automotive applications; unprocessed plastic materials in granule form for manufacturing automotive parts; raw plastics in the form of granules, unprocessed plastic in the form of granules for use in industry for manufacturing automotive parts; unprocessed plastics in the form of granules for manufacturing automotive parts; unprocessed polymer resins in the form of granules for manufacturing automotive parts; compounded unprocessed plastics in granular form for injection molding and extrusion applications for manufacturing automotive parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Unprocessed and semi-processed rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica and substitutes for all these materials, namely synthetic rubber; plastics and resins in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing and insulating materials; semi-processed plastic granules for use in manufacture; extruded plastics in the form of granules for use in manufacture; compounded processed plastics in granular form for use in manufacture, namely for injection molding and extrusion applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of plastic and composite parts in the form of powders and granules for automotive applications; custom manufacture of compounded raw and processed plastics in granular form for use in injection molding and extrusion applications for manufacturing automotive parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |