Drawing for COREVISION

USPTO serial 79232933

COREVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COREVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD W. GOODMAN, EDWARD BLOCKER, MICHAEL E. MARION, DAVID SCHREIBER

EDWARD W. GOODMAN, EDWARD BLOCKER, MICHAEL E. MARI PHILIPS IP&S465 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SUITE 340VALHALLA, NY 10595UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Imaging apparatus and instruments for medical use, namely, for image guided therapy, utilizing vascular imaging and intravascular imaging and measurements, and the fusion of such measurements for increased diagnostic capabilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 9, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 27, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 24, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance